Irvine Housing Blog |
Distressed inventory to weigh on house prices for at least three more years Posted: 12 Jul 2011 03:29 AM PDT A data analyst for the National Association of realtors is projecting it will take at least three years to liquidate the distressed inventory. In reality, it will take much longer.
Irvine Home Address ... 15 CRIVELLI AISLE Irvine, CA 92606
On very rare occasions, representatives of realtor associations provide an accurate view of the housing market. Today we have and interview with the OC Register and Jed Smith, the managing director of quantitative research for the National Association of realtors. i disagree with many of his specific points, but he is painting a realistically grim view of the next few years. 3 years needed to clear ‘distressed’ homesJuly 9th, 2011, 1:00 am -- Jeff Collins
IHB: Most sources believe the housing market is not at the bottom, and more bad news is on the way.
IHB: Yes, there is widespread recognition that realtors cannot predict anything. Mostly, they will call the bottom at every opportunity and blather on about how now is a good time to buy.
IHB: Cautious optimism indeed.
Us: The housing recovery is on anything but warp speed. How much longer will this downturn go on? IHB: Sales have not fluctuated much. Sales have crashed hard, and remain near historic lows. We do not appear to be in a recovery mode. We are in the second leg down of a double dip in home prices.
IHB: To whom does it look like sales will be stronger? Why would sales increase during a time of year when sales and prices typically decline?
IHB: For those of us waiting for the bubble to deflate so we can buy a house at a reasonable valuation, prices drops have been a major satisfaction. Part of the price weakness in existing home sales has been to the overall deleveraging in the economy, IHB: Yes, lenders made many Americans insolvent by giving them more debt than they could possibly service. The deleveraging has not finished as lenders still have billions of dollars in bad loans to write off. and part of the price situation has been driven by the significant number of distressed home sales (foreclosures and short sales) that have driven the markets. Approximately 35% of existing home sales are distressed, and while the number will fluctuate from month to month, we expect to continue to have a distressed property situation for the next three years. IHB: If the NAr is admitting it will take three years, it's safe to assume it will take five to seven.
IHB: Eventually prices will stabilize. In a few years, we may see some modest price increases in the areas where the recovery is the strongest. Absorption of distressed inventory is the key, but the total volume is also very important. Since the NAr is unwilling or unable to give us accurate measures of either shadow inventory or the rate of absorption, they have no clue how long the process will take. Us: What’s holding the housing market back? IHB: Job creation will not happen quickly, and we still have 38% unemployment in the construction trades locally. Loan availability will not improve until those potential borrowers who have gone through short sale or foreclosure are offered loans. It will be quite a while.
IHB: Pent up demand is the bullshit realtors smell when they know they have nothing else. In addition, low interest rates are not particularly beneficial if financial institutions have unrealistically high credit standards due to excessive risk aversion. IHB: That statement is true, but those are not the conditions we are facing. Credit standards are still too low. We are arguing over the definition of a qualified residential mortgage because lenders want to shift risk to the US Taxpayer. Lenders may finally reach a point of excessive risk aversion, but since we are exiting a period where lenders had no risk aversion whatsoever, any tightening of credit standards feels excessive. Lenders will continue to tighten standards until they stop losing money. Finally, some additional recovery of consumer confidence, which will probably occur as people realize that the Great Recession is over, will help to facilitate the housing markets. We are already seeing modest improvements on a local basis in home sales and prices, and hopefully the recovery will gather steam. IHB: What local market is he talking about? Orange County home sales just hit a three-year low.
IHB: Distressed sales reset market pricing. Delusional sellers with WTF asking prices don't count. Further, if sales were robust and demand were strong, distressed properties would not need to be discounted in order to sell. In a weak demand market, all sales will be below recent comps. Lowering price is the only way to generate sufficient buyer interest to sell property. By implication, Jed is leading us to believe that prices will rebound 20% when distressed sales stop. That isn't necessarily the case. If demand is low, any seller would be required to lower price to sell. The must-sell inventory of distressed sellers is leading prices lower now, but anyone who wants to sell is facing the same dynamic of low demand. The total level of foreclosures and short sales has been in the neighborhood of 35% of overall existing home sales for the past several years, sometimes more, sometimes less on a monthly basis.
IHB: The realistic outlook is is for stagnant sales and moderately falling prices, perhaps steeply falling this fall and winter. Perhaps next year we will see some stabilization in pricing and sales, but not in 2011.
IHB: Complete and utter bullshit. Lenders are competing with each other to get loans from borrowers with large down payments and high FICO scores. There aren't very many of those people. The borrowers who can't obtain credit are those with little or no money to put down and low FICO scores. To suggest otherwise is to perpetuate a self-serving lie endorsed by the NAr. We get approximately 1,000 comments every month in response to our Realtors Confidence Index survey, and our members cite numerous examples of responsible potential buyers being unable to get mortgages. IHB: Yes, unqualified borrowers are not getting loans. They shouldn't. Giving unqualified borrowers loans is one of the causes of the epidemic of foreclosures after the collapse of the housing bubble. realtors from the bubble era are not accustomed to lenders turning down anyone, so they whine and complain when their unsuitable borrower cannot get a loan. Financial institutions appear to have become unduly risk averse. This has a major negative impact on the housing markets. The pendulum has not swung back too far. Banks are returning to normal sound underwriting standards. That's why credit availability is an "issue." Credit availability is supposed to be an issue. It is supposed to be a barrier to entering the housing market. Borrowers are supposed to demonstrate they can repay the loan to sustain home ownership. We abandoned those standards during the bubble, and now the market must adjust to the sane lending standards of 20 years ago. Us: Any final thoughts? There is a tendency of realtors to pimp the market by promising delusional returns for those who buy homes. They should stop. People do want to own for lifestyle preferences, but that doesn't mean they should be forced to pay a huge premium over renting to do it. In addition, NAR surveys indicate that homeowners currently own a home, on average, for approximately 8 years; monthly or even yearly fluctuations in value are actually of no significance to most homeowners. IHB: LOL! "yearly fluctuations in value are actually of no significance to most homeowners?" I can't believe he actually said that. Everyone in California lived for the yearly fluctuation in home values so they could go back to the housing ATM for more money. Changes in home values are an obsession with most California homeowners.
On that we can all agree. Double the mortgage, double the funThe market peaked more than five years ago, and lending standards have been much tighter since then. However, there is still no shortage of HELOC abusers to profile on a daily basis. The owners of today's featured property more than doubled their mortgage in the twelve years they owned this house. Whatever equity they had was spent.
Perhaps doubling the mortgage wasn't a good idea. I think adding to a mortgage is a bad idea. Doubling it... well, I still can't believe how common it was. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Irvine House Address ... 15 CRIVELLI AISLE Irvine, CA 92606
|
You are subscribed to email updates from Irvine Housing Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
0 comments:
Post a Comment